
As shown, as of 2014, the uninsured have begun to drop, no matter the language used to say so. The main difference in language between each; however, is how they talk about the future for the health care plan. The NY Times says the plan promises "big change" and is going to "eliminate the problem" of the uninsured. However, the ABC news video embedded within the article talks about how the plan is going to cost huge amounts to support the site, as well as continually support the insurance plans of others. The correspondent mentions that, " $4,000,000 alone was used on a site that remained non functional for awhile, making it unable for people to follow up after signing up for the plan. Visible between their similarities in language, you an see that the health care plan offers a drop in the uninsured, but without fixing finances, the future of the plan is going to deteriorate in the eyes of one, but in the other, it is going to succeed in the future, whilst eliminating the unemployed, without referencing the cost of the plan.
Here's the link for the NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/27/us/is-the-affordable-care-act-working.html?_r=0#/affordability
And here's a link for the ABC article and video: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamacare-truth-myths/story?id=20650455
No comments:
Post a Comment